photos are stripped from meta data which should include GPS at least. Instead it is written on the picture which is very hard to parse
Guest
| Company | Laing O'Rourke |
| Job Title / Role | Principal Digital Engineer |
| I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
i agree - the stamping the gps on the photo is pretty useless as you cant do anythign with it. would like to be able to display photos on other software (such as GIS) for visual representation of progree for example
Display them in GIS software (map).
But I believe it is not so much a problem of adding it as much as not removing it. What is the reason for removing this data in the first place?
What are you ultimately trying to solve for by adding in GPS data on the photos?